Test Footer

Welcome to AIPEU, Group-C,Secunderabad Division,Telangana Circle.Make A Grand Success,March to Parliament on December 15th For more news visit http://aipeugroupctelangana.blogspot.in

Tuesday, December 31, 2013

Happy New Year to All

AIPEU Group-C, Secunderabad division wishes to all the members and all the blog viewers a Happy and Prosperous New Year 2014


Monday, December 30, 2013

Letter addressed to SSPOs regarding Problems faced by the staff at Trimulgherry HO

To
The Sr.Supdt.of Post Offices
Secunderabad Division
Hyderabad-500080

Sir,

Sub: -  Shortage of staff and problems faced by the staff at Trimulgherry HO-Request for immediate intervention-Reg

            It is brought to the notice of this union that the staff working at Trimulgherry HO are facing problems due to shortage of staff which leads to work under acute pressure and the incomplete/pendency work is likely to lead to undetected frauds if any committed by S.O’s, while performing the duties ordered by the competent authority.  The following problems are brought to your kind notice for immediate intervention and needful efforts to resolve the issues.

1.      Consequent up on temporary attachment of two PA posts from Secunderabad HO to Trimulgherry HO the work of SB branch has been redistributed and arranged one Sr.PA and one LCVI posts in addition to the existing staff. But physically the work has been entrusted to existing staff on OTA basis for months together. The very purpose of the temporary attachment of two PA posts from Secunderabad HO to Trimulgherry HO has been defeated.  Hence this union requests you to arrange to issue suitable instructions to the Postmaster, Trimulgherry HO to post sufficient staff in SB branch as it involves monitory transactions and there must be a responsibility. Frequent disturbance of S.B branch staff leads to dislocation of the work. The postmaster may post the regular staff in SB branch and he may examine feasibility of the utilization of out sourcing staff in other branches.
2.      It is bring to the notice of this union that the system generated consolidation of RD has several discrepancies. The matter was brought to the notice of DPS (Hqrs) during the meeting held on 04/09/2013 at CO. The solution given by the CO is to generate from “Daily consolidation entries”. But it is bring to your kind notice that under this module for each office total deposit figure and total withdrawal figures to be fed. Under this module data fed in daily consolidated entries differs with that of system generated..
3.      It is bring to the notice of this union that 90% of master data is not available at Trimulgherry HO in respect of decentralized schemes [S.B-3 CARD remains at S.O]. This union requests to take appropriate measures to restore master data at Trimulgherry HO immediately.

4.      It is bring to the notice of this union that R.D and MIS feeding was carried out by outsourcing duly providing separate server under the supervision of S.B.C.O. But without any verification of the genuineness of  the data,it was migrated to S.B server which resulting in various types of discrepancies. MOST of the closed accounts at S.O remain LIVE at H.O and closed accounts at H.O remain LIVE at S.O. This has to be rectified immediately as there is every possibility of another financial misappropriation /fraud
5.      While generating MIS Consolidation on “Daily transaction entries” following discrepancies were noticed
(a)  Out of 34 SOs only 29 SOs transactions reflected
(b)  Total Deposits and Total withdrawal figures reflected incorrectly
(c)   It is giving a remark as “cannot alter previous date consolidation entries”
In this connection, it is requested to depute SOFTWARE EXPERT to locate irrelevant discrepancies arising in R.D. The staff position to be considered at par with sec’bad H.O.
6.      It is bring to the notice of this union that RD, MIS and SCSS data feeding work was carried out by outsourcing staff, but the genuineness of the data not verified by S.B.C.O.  The following irregularities were  noticed in S.C.S.S data:

(a)  ANANDBAGH AND MANOVIKAS NAGAR SCSS DATA feeding was carried out by outsourcing staff. SOFTWARE EXPERT may be deputed to locate the errors, apart from the irregularity mentioned below as SCSS accounts comprises huge amounts in lakhs in order to avoid innocent staff being penalized at later stages.
(b)  Several SCSS closed accounts were fed by the out sourcing staff and the status of those accounts in the system is “Live”
(c)   Extended SCSS accounts were not been fed as extended in the system and data not fed.
(d)  The correctness of the data fed by the outsourcing staff is not checked at any stage and the data fed by them is dumped in to SBSOs as it is, It is highly irregular.
7.      It is not understood that how the payment is being made to outsourcing staff without checking the correctness of their work and without work completion certificate from the competent authority.
8.      The officials working in the SB branch are working under duress with heavy work load and heavy financial responsibility. The administration has to consider the extenuating circumstances in which the officials are working, while identifying the subsidiary offenders and fixing up contributory negligence as stipulated in Rule 107 of Postal Manual Vol-III and asses the responsibility in a realistic manner.
9.      It is also bring to the notice of this union that while calculating the contributory negligence and identifying the subsidiary offenders the administration is ignoring the facts explained above and making the innocent officials as scapegoats without considering their submission and without giving reasonable opportunity to them.

Keeping in view of the circumstances explained above, this union earnestly requests you to
take appropriate measures to set right the things and allow the innocent officials to work in a stress free and transparent environment to serve the department and deliver the quality of work.

Yours faithfully


(T.Suresh Kumar)

Saturday, December 28, 2013

CAT CHENNAI quashes fresh proceedings against retired employee

                                                
                                                     
                               THE TIMES OF INDIA   

PRESS NEWS    
                                            
           CHENNAI: 27.12.2013.  Can an employee be punished twice for the same offence? No, said the Chennai bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) on Wednesday quashing an order of the ministry of communications and IT to initiate fresh proceedings against a retired assistant postmaster who had undergone punishment for his supervisory lapses.
      The matter pertains to V Muthukannu, sub-postmaster in Karur division, who was accused of irregular closure of a recurring deposit and non-account of deposits. In his submissions to the tribunal, Muthukannu said in March 2010, the superintendent of post offices ordered recovery of Rs 8,000 per month from his salary for the loss caused to the postal department. After seven months, it was increased to Rs 12,000. For his contributory negligence, he paid Rs 5.07 lakh to the department. Also, for a year, his salary was reduced and no increments were provided, said Muthukannu.
     However, in April 2012, a month before his retirement, the member (personnel), department of posts, dropped the earlier concluded proceedings and initiated a fresh proceeding for the same lapses. He was also issued a memo stating his retirement benefits had been withheld. He asked the CAT to set aside the order for fresh proceedings.
     In the counter, the department of post denied the averments and said Muthukannu was involved in a fraud to the tune of Rs 17.46 lakh at the Karur head post office. Fresh proceedings were initiated according to the rules and there was no question of "double jeopardy." Further, it was an exceptional case and had to be dealt with accordingly.
    The bench comprising judicial member B Venkateshwara Rao and administrative member P Prabhakaran said, "Once the punishment imposed is undergone, no one can direct a fresh inquiry in the same set of charges."
       The bench quashed the order for fresh proceedings and directed the department to pay all retrial benefits to Muthukannu.

Friday, December 27, 2013

Calendar of Departmental Examinations 2014

Sl No.
Name of the Examination
Proposed
(A) Centralised Examination
1
Inspector of Posts Examination
23rd and 24th August 2014
2
Ps Gr ‘B’ Examination
15-06-2014
3
Postmaster Grade – I Exam
15-06-2014
4
LGO Examination for PAs/SAs in Circle
24th August 2014 Sunday
5
Junior Engineer (C & E)Examination 
Will be notified after receipt of Question Banks and revised syllabus.

6
Assistant Engineer (C&E) Examination
Same as Above
7
Sr. Postmaster Examination
Tentatively proposed to be held in October 2014, by which time it is expected that court verdicts will be pronounced.
8
PA/SAs Direct Recruitment  Examination
March 2014 for 2013 vacancies. Another recruitment in November 2014 for 2014 vacancies.
9
Assistant Manager (MMS)
Will  be notified after receipt of revised RecttRules, Question Banks and Revised Syllabus 
10
Assistant Accounts Officer(AAO)
 As Above.

 

Sl No.
Name of the Examination
Proposed Schedule tentatively
(B) De-centralised Examination
1
Confirmation Examination for direct recruit Jr Accountants in PAO
17th & 18th may 2014
2
LDCs to Junior Accountants in PAOs
14th &15th June 2014
3
LGO Examination for promotion to Assistants of other wings i.e. MMS , Foreign Post, RLO, Stores Depot and CO/RO
20th July 2014
4
LGO Examination for promotion to Assistants of other wings i.e. MMS , Foreign Post, RLO, Stores Depot and CO/RO
To be held in October for 2014 vacancies.
5
PO&RMS Accountant Examination
25th May,2014
6
Departmental Examination for promotion to LDCs in PAOs fromSorters and MTS.
27.7.2014
7
Departmental Examination for promotion to LDCs in PAOs from MTS qualified in matriculation
17.08.2014

Friday, December 20, 2013

Results of Postman and MTS Examination held on 15/12/2013

 Postman Examination Results

1
K  Yadaiah, GDS BPM, Kankal a/wPurgi SO
SDDN/PM/105/2013
SC
13
24
21
19
77
Selected against OC vacancy

2
A Ramesh, GDS BPM, Chennaram, a/w Yalal SO
SDDN/PM/109/2013
OBC
13
22
14
20
69
Selected against OC vacancy
3
Kammari Srinivas , BPM, Marpally Kalan, a/w Mominpet SO
SDDN/PM/111/2013
OBC
17
17
14
19
67
Selected against OC vacancy
4
M Ramulu, GDS BPM, Mubarakpur, a/w Shankerpalli SO
SDDN/PM/104/2013
SC
13
19
20
15
67
Selected against OC vacancy
5
S Hanumantha Rao, GDSBPM, Cheriyal BO, A/w Ghatkesar SO
SDDN/PM/115/2013
OBC
17
17
16
16
66
Selected against OC vacancy


OBC = 03 Vacancies
S.
No.
Name and designation with Roll Number
Community
Marks Secured
Total
Remarks
Paper
A
Paper
B
Paper
C-I
Paper    C-II
1
Feroz Baba, GDS BPM, Timmaipalli, A/w Yalal SO
SDDN/PM/52/2013
OBC
15
13
17
15
60
---
2
G Gouri  Shanker, GDS BPM, Indur BO, a/w Peddimal SO
SDDN/PM/91/2013
OBC
16
16
10
14
56
---
3
Ch Karish Kumar, GDS BPM, Arkatala BO, a/w Nawabpet SO Now wkg as MTS, Sithaphalmandi SO
SDDN/PM/116/2013
OBC
11
13
10
15
49
---

SC = 02 Vacancies
S.
No.
Name and designation with Roll Number
Community
Marks Secured
Total
Remarks
Paper
A
Paper
B
Paper
C-I
Paper    C-II
1
Nalla Sayanna, GDS BPM, Uddemarri BO, a/w NISA Hakimpet SO
SDDN/PM/106/2013
SC
13
13
10
20
56
----
2
Raja Rao Ramala, GDS MD, I E Moulali SO
SDDN/PM/43/2013
SC
9
10
9
14
42
---

ST = 01 Vacancy
S.
No.
Name and designation with Roll Number
Community
Marks Secured
Total
Remarks
Paper
A
Paper
B
Paper
C-I
Paper    C-II
1
Dhiravath Naresh, GDS BPM, Goudavlli, a/w Medcal SO
SDDN/PM/103/2013
ST
9
21
19
16
65
----

 
MTS Examination Results

Sl.No
Name of the Candidate
& designation
Roll Number
Marks
Total Marks

Com
munity
Rem arks
Part A
Part
B
Part
C
Part
D
1
Sri A V Partha Sarathi, GDS BPM, Rampalli Dayara BO, a/w Ghatkesar SO
SDDN/MTS/90/2013
19
22
14
20
75
oc
----
Sl.No
Name of the Candidate
& designation
Roll Number
Marks
Total Marks

Com
munity
Rem arks
Part A
Part
B
Part
C
Part
D
1
Sri A Ramesh, BPM Chennaram a/w Yalal SO
SDDN/MTS/63/2013
16
20
9
23
68
OBC
----